🔗 Share this article

The count of guaranteed seats for Māori representatives on NZ councils will be slashed by over 50%, following a controversial legislative amendment that forced municipal councils to submit the fate of hard-won Indigenous wards to a popular referendum.

Background Information on Indigenous Representation

Māori wards, which may have multiple elected officials based on local population numbers, were created in 2001 to give Indigenous voters the choice to vote for a assured Indigenous council member in local and regional authorities. Originally, local governments could only establish a Indigenous seat by initially putting it to a community referendum in their region. Communities often devoted considerable time generating local support and urging their local governments to establish Indigenous representation.

Policy Changes and Administrative Decisions

To address this concern, the former administration allowed municipal authorities to set up a Māori ward without first requiring them to put it to a public vote.

However, this year, the current administration overturned the policy, saying local residents should decide whether to establish Māori wards.

Voting Outcomes

The coalition’s law change required local authorities that had created a ward under Labour’s rules to hold decisive public votes alongside the municipal polls, which concluded on October 11. Of 42 councils taking part in the public vote, 17 decided to retain their wards, and twenty-five to disestablish theirs – revealing many regions opposed to guaranteed Māori representation.

The results provided “a crucial move in restoring local democratic control.”

Opposition parties however have criticised the new policy as “racist” and “anti-Māori”. After assuming power, the current administration has implemented sweeping rollbacks to measures intended to enhance Māori health, wellbeing and representation. Officials has stated it aims to terminate “ethnic-specific” policies, and says it is committed to enhancing results for Māori and all New Zealanders.

Urban-Rural Divide

Outcomes of the public votes were divided down urban-rural lines – six of the seven urban centers required to vote backed Māori wards, while rural regions skewed heavily towards disestablishing them.

“It’s a real shame for the Māori wards that had recently been established – they’re only just starting to hit their stride.”

Voter Turnout and Concerns

The recent municipal polls registered the lowest voter turnout in 36 years, with less than a third of citizens participating, prompting demands for reform.

The process had been “a mockery”.

Differential Standards

Councils are able to create other types of wards – such as rural wards – without first requiring a community ballot. The disparate requirements applied to Indigenous representation indicated the government was targeting Indigenous inclusion.

“Ultimately, they were unsuccessful. Numerous localities have given the government a middle finger response.”

This remark concerned the 17 regions that voted to retain their seats.